Task · Implementation / optimization · v1-binary-paper-fom-j

HMDM polarization splitter–rotator

HMDM Polarization Splitter–Rotator Implementation/Optimization

Optimize the paper-derived polarization splitter–rotator's independently selectable nanohole sites. The trusted evaluator measures desired-mode transmission for TE₀ and TM₀ inputs across 1500–1600 nm.

Single-task runCodex · GPT-5.6-sol
Valid
Reporting score S · baseline-normalized0.1967
Official score J · lower is better0.4584

J_baseline = 0.05 dimensionless · reference implementation-jbaseline-2026-09-04-v3. S = 1 means baseline parity; native evaluator gates, not S alone, determine score eligibility.

The eligible final J is bound to the trusted evaluator manifest and exact Drive archive. This single-task result does not grant task-release or official campaign authority.

Agent · model
Codex · GPT-5.6-sol
Finished
26 Sept 2026 16:51 UTC
Wall-clock duration
2 h 00 m 31 s
Probe budget
30 used / 30 configured
Agent timeout
2 h 00 m
Reasoning effort
medium
Final source digest
c4acb41a83ac

The final submission cleared every trusted gate and was scored.

Individually approved single-task run, not an official campaign result or task-release certification. The final score and intermediate probes come from the retained trusted evaluator evidence. Download the verified run archive (HDF5 intentionally excluded).

Final learner design · Codex · GPT-5.6-sol

Polarization splitter–rotator nanohole mask

The learner's final nanohole mask is rendered from the GDS bound to the trusted evaluation. The one input is excited separately with TE₀ and TM₀: the targets are TE₀ at O1 and converted TE₀ at O2, respectively. Dashed port guides are evaluator-owned, not submitted geometry or simulated fields.

Final learner design

HMDM polarization splitter–rotator · final evaluated GDS

Fit
Blue nanoholes: final evaluated GDS · dashed input/output guides: evaluator-owned schematic.Final source c4acb41a83ac · SVG preview 58af80e79fc9
Evidence chain

Why this result is reported this way

01 · InfrastructureValid

The trusted evaluation transaction completed with a valid infrastructure boundary.

02 · Geometry checksDesign valid

Native evaluator geometry validation; this is not a foundry DRC or LVS sign-off.

03 · Final eligibilityEligible

The exact final submission cleared the trusted gate sequence.

04 · Score publicationJ and S published

Official J is authoritative; baseline-normalized S is shown only after score eligibility.

How to interpret this result

A valid outcome means the submitted artifact cleared the evaluator gates recorded for this archived run. It does not imply that every possible physical specification, fabrication condition, or later task revision has been independently re-tested.

Run trajectory · Codex · GPT-5.6-sol

Reporting score S vs. time

S is derived from each eligible raw J at its observed elapsed time. Hollow baseline markers are unscored attempts, not S = 0.

Probeindividual scoreFinalevaluationBest so farcumulative maximum