Task · Implementation / optimization · v1-binary-paper-envelope-j

HMDM six-channel WDM

HMDM Six-Channel WDM Binary Optimization

Optimize a six-channel WDM nanohole mask with independently selectable sites across the paper-derived design region. The trusted evaluator measures worst-channel insertion loss and crosstalk against the paper envelope.

Single-task runCodex · GPT-5.6-sol
Valid
Reporting score S · baseline-normalized0.1259
Official score J · lower is better14.8897

J_baseline = 1 dimensionless · reference implementation-jbaseline-2026-09-04-v3. S = 1 means baseline parity; native evaluator gates, not S alone, determine score eligibility.

The eligible final J is bound to the trusted evaluator manifest and exact Drive archive. This single-task result does not grant task-release or official campaign authority.

Agent · model
Codex · GPT-5.6-sol
Finished
25 Sept 2026 03:42 UTC
Wall-clock duration
2 h 00 m 20 s
Probe budget
30 used / 30 configured
Agent timeout
2 h 00 m
Reasoning effort
medium
Final source digest
1e96c36c784d

The final submission cleared every trusted gate and was scored.

Individually approved single-task run, not an official campaign result or task-release certification. The final score and intermediate probes come from the retained trusted evaluator evidence. Download the verified run archive (HDF5 intentionally excluded).

The final submission was score-eligible, but did not meet the paper-envelope optical targets: worst insertion loss 14.45 dB (reference ≤ 2.6 dB) and worst relative crosstalk 1.73 dB (reference < −10 dB). These shortfalls are included in J.

Final learner design · Codex · GPT-5.6-sol

Six-channel WDM nanohole mask

The blue nanoholes are rendered from the learner's final GDS used in the trusted evaluation. Dashed guides mark the evaluator-owned input and six output ports; they are schematic, not submitted geometry.

Final learner design

HMDM six-channel WDM · final evaluated GDS

Fit
Blue nanoholes: final evaluated GDS · dashed port guides: evaluator-owned schematic.Final source 1e96c36c784d · SVG preview c1805f064bd1
Evidence chain

Why this result is reported this way

01 · InfrastructureValid

The trusted evaluation transaction completed with a valid infrastructure boundary.

02 · Geometry checksDesign valid

Native evaluator geometry validation; this is not a foundry DRC or LVS sign-off.

03 · Final eligibilityEligible

The exact final submission cleared the trusted gate sequence.

04 · Score publicationJ and S published

Official J is authoritative; baseline-normalized S is shown only after score eligibility.

How to interpret this result

A valid outcome means the submitted artifact cleared the evaluator gates recorded for this archived run. It does not imply that every possible physical specification, fabrication condition, or later task revision has been independently re-tested.

Run trajectory · Codex · GPT-5.6-sol

Reporting score S vs. time

S is derived from each eligible raw J at its observed elapsed time. Hollow baseline markers are unscored attempts, not S = 0.

Probeindividual scoreFinalevaluationBest so farcumulative maximum